28 Sep 2009
EDITORIAL com Alejandro Peña Esclusa da Fuerza Solidaria e da UnoAmérica.
Não demonstre medo diante de seus inimigos. Seja bravo e justo e Deus o amará. Diga sempre a verdade, mesmo que isso o leve à morte. Proteja os mais fracos e seja correto. Assim, você estará em paz com Deus e contigo.
TipsRevolucionarios - Canal de vídeo da UNOAMERICA Alejandro Peña Esclusa, Presidente de UnoAmerica, en el Programa La Noche de RCN - 13 Agosto 2009 - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/ruedalo. | |

Presidente de UnoAmérica em Washington
“É difícil que Chávez chegue a 2012”
Nas entrevistas concedidas aos meios de comunicação norte-americanos e nas reuniões realizadas, Peña Esclusa explicou os alcances de UnoAmérica, plataforma de ONGs latino-americanas que se opõem ao Foro de São Paulo. Também advertiu sobre o perigo que significa para as democracias ocidentais a aliança entre o Socialismo do Século XXI e o fundamentalismo islâmico.
por Alejandro Peña Esclusa
28 de fevereiro de 2009
Em 6 de janeiro de 2009, Hugo Chávez expulsou o embaixador de Israel na Venezuela. No dia seguinte, o grupo terrorista Hamas felicitou publicamente a “valente medida do presidente venezuelano”. Três semanas mais tarde, depois de reiterados discursos anti-semitas por parte de funcionários venezuelanos, a Sinagoga Tiferet Israel em Caracas foi selvagemente profanada. Os perpetradores foram posteriormente capturados pela polícia, porém não há dúvida de que atuaram incentivados pelo discurso oficialista.
Os fatos não são casuais. São o resultado dos múltiplos acordos políticos e econômicos firmados entre Chávez e o presidente do Irã, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, que prometeu “apagar Israel da face da Terra”. Cabe perguntar: a que se deve esta estranha aliança entre um dirigente marxista venezuelano e um líder fundamentalista iraniano?
Em que pese o mito do suposto apoio com que Chávez conta, a realidade é que ele se mantém no poder devido à fraude eleitoral, à compra de consciências, à repressão contra seus adversários e o medo generalizado. Chávez sabe muito bem que, com a queda do preço do petróleo, enfrentará muito em breve uma situação muito difícil caracterizada pela inflação, o desemprego e o desabastecimento.
Frente à crise, os venezuelanos exigirão resultados concretos que Chávez será incapaz de lhes proporcionar. Além disso, o culparão por não ter feito previsões nos tempos de bonança e por ter diesperdiçado milhares de dólares em sua revolução continental. De modo que não lhe restará outro remédio senão recorrer à repressão para refrear a população.
Chávez não acredita que os militares venezuelanos estejam dispostos a cometer delitos de lesa-humanidade para sustentar seu governo. As milícias e as forças para-militares oficialistas não estão suficientemente preparadas. As FARC colombianas – aliadas incondicionais de Chávez – estão sendo desmanteladas. Portanto, Chávez necessita de outra força de choque capaz de conter o descontentamento popular e aferrá-lo no poder.
Em finais de 1962, se apresentou a Fidel Castro uma situação similar à que hoje vive Chávez. Apesar de haver derrotado seus adversários na Baía dos Porcos, Castro ficou debilitado e preocupado. A solução para seu dilema foi emprestar o território cubano para a colocação de mísseis nucleares soviéticos alinhados para os Estados Unidos. Como conseqüência da “crise dos mísseis”, foi assinado um acordo entre Kennedy e Kruschev que, dentre outras coisas, serviu para manter o regime castrista até a presente data.
Chávez, pupilo de Fidel Castro, aprendeu a lição; só que substituiu a ameaça soviética do século XX pela ameaça moderna do século XXI: o fundamentalismo islâmico. Chávez pretende emprestar o território venezuelano aos grupos terroristas do Oriente Médio, não só para que o defendam internamente com o uso das armas, mas para ter uma poderosa ferramenta de dissuasão para com seus adversários internacionais.
Como se fosse pouco, Chávez exportou sua estratégia de terror abrindo a seu “irmão” Ahmadinejad as portas da Bolívia, do Equador e da Nicarágua, cujos governos também assinaram acordos políticos e econômicos com o Irã. Se semelhante loucura não for freada logo, desta vez a “crise dos mísseis” ocorrerá em nível continental.
Tradução: Graça Salgueiro
| Por Alejandro Peña Esclusa Politica The demolition of the Berlin Wall and the implosion of the Soviet Empire in 1990, in addition to the adoption of private enterprise in China, led to the belief that the long nightmare of the Marxist social engineering experiment was over. The world was moving towards globalization- depicted by the phrase “global village”. Martes, 24 de Febrero de 2009 |
|
Prologue The demolition of the Berlin Wall and the implosion of the Soviet Empire in 1990, in addition to the adoption of private enterprise in China, led to the belief that the long nightmare of the Marxist social engineering experiment was over. The world was moving towards globalization- depicted by the phrase “global village”. The once powerful communist parties of Western Europe were shamed into changing their names and doctrine. In Latin America, the only Marxist country was Cuba, suffering under the iron fist of a senile dictator. Cuba had just lost the Soviet subsidies that allowed it to pay for its oil and food. The predictions of Francis Fukuyama, in the sense that ideology would no longer subsist, rang true. Liberal economics would be the rule the world over. Many in Colombia, myself included, thought the communist guerrillas –FARC and ELN- would quickly sue for peace. At the time, there was little inkling that they would prosper and grow by becoming masters of the “up-stream” end of the drug trade. No one heeded to a desperate initiative set in motion by Fidel Castro, who urgently needed to break out of his isolation. Castro turned to the leader of the most powerful leftist party in the Americas: Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of the Worker’s Party of Brazil (PT). Lula had nearly won the presidency a year before. Together, they arranged the largest meeting of leftist parties and terrorists ever held on the Continent. The event was hosted by Lula in Sao Paulo, his power base. Elsewhere on the Continent, communism was in a profound crisis. The Sandinistas would lose power in 1990, in an election forced upon them, and the communist insurgency in El Salvador was on the wane. It was in those difficult times, having lost the support and guidance of Moscow, that the Sao Paulo Forum (FSP) was born. It would become a broad and effective alliance of communist parties and guerrilla movements that would soon make spectacular progress towards recovering lost ground and advancing the Marxist cause throughout the Continent. It included communist parties and others with different names but similar ideologies, as well as terrorist movements. This was quite in line with the Marxist doctrine on the combination of all forms of struggle. Along with the Colombian Communist Party, the FSP included the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) and the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN), the Peruvian Communist Party, the MRTA guerrillas and similar combinations in other countries. Few politicians or democratic leaders on the Continent took notice of the newborn threat. They thought it was just another rabble of loud Marxists, nostalgic for the collapsed Soviet Empire, a group organization that would be convened every so often to denounce cruel and heartless capitalism and the imperialistic United States. After all, it now seemed that communism was effectively dead, a painful aberration of history, and - like Nazism before it - would soon become politically irrelevant. What a serious mistake! There were, of course, long speeches and Marxist rhetoric, but the FSP would be much more than the usual talking meeting. It is a real continental organization, much more effective than Stalin’s stodgy COMINTERN. In fact, the mutual support among its members has allowed communists, sometimes in alliance with more moderate parties, to rise to power in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua. That same solidarity also allowed Marxism to survive in Cuba, after a half century of economic failure. The FSP candidates lost presidential elections by slim margins in Mexico and Peru. Luck played its part in that success. Hugo Chavez, after a failed coup in 1992, was pardoned and released from prison by President Caldera. He was elected president of Venezuela in 1998. His party, Movimiento V República (MVP), had joined the FSP in 1995. Oil prices, long stagnant, would soon start their climb to record highs. Chavez used his oil revenues to fund candidates of his choice and to buy the votes of small Caribbean island states. The FSP’s next target is El Salvador, where the party of the former FMLN guerrillas, generously funded by the clownish Venezuelan president, has a good chance of winning the presidency. The FSP has developed strategies and techniques to gain power through democratic elections. Several campaigns and political parties have been funded through PDVSA, the Venezuelan state-owned oil company, and the FARC have contributed to others. Once power is secured, there are strategies to hold on to it. One is, of course, and not surprisingly, to develop popular hatred of the “Empire” (the US), as well as class confrontation. But, beyond that, most regimes have fueled ethnic mistrust. The governments try to give the impression that they are following democratic procedures, but electoral fraud is used blatantly, and all power is concentrated eventually in the executive branch. A new constitution is drafted - one that concentrates power in the executive branch and allows repeated reelection. The armed forces that fought armed subversion are reduced through “judicial warfare,” which includes disowning laws on amnesty for the military but, of course, not for terrorists. Violent militias or pressure groups, outside formal government control, are organized to intimidate the opposition –along the line of Hitler’s infamous “brown shirts”. One of the few who has called attention to the FSP and its importance is Alejandro Peña-Esclusa. He has traveled to a number of countries to warn anyone who would listen about the threat to freedom and democracy on the Continent posed by the FSP. Few listened, and fewer still did anything to counteract the threat. For the press, all of this was not newsworthy. Government leaders usually do not see threats beyond their borders. Business leaders do not look much beyond their next accounting period, and many think they can somehow deal with any government that comes to power. In the Colombian case, it has long been known that Chávez and Correa supported the FARC guerrilla in various ways, including safe havens and easy access to weapons and supplies. Glaring proof of this was found in the computer files of Raúl Reyes, the FARC’s second in command, killed in Ecuador by an air strike on his camp in Ecuadoran territory. The strike was carried out by the Colombian Air Force. The Colombian government has leaked a minimal part of the contents of those files, but has decided to keep most of the evidence secret, in the hope of maintaining good relations with its neighbors and trading partners. One example is the evidence concerning Brazilian government officials who had extensive relations with the FARC. The FSP is a threat to all democracies and the Reyes files should be open to all, especially to those who now suffer under FSP dictatorships and those who are endangered by the FSP conspiracy. |